2021
Inactive status is an independent predictor of liver transplant waitlist mortality and is associated with a transplant centers median meld at transplant
Merola J, Gan G, Stewart D, Noreen S, Mulligan D, Batra R, Haakinson D, Deng Y, Kulkarni S. Inactive status is an independent predictor of liver transplant waitlist mortality and is associated with a transplant centers median meld at transplant. PLOS ONE 2021, 16: e0260000. PMID: 34793524, PMCID: PMC8601542, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260000.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDonor service areasWaitlist mortalityTransplant centersMedian MELDHigh mortalityStatus changesLiver transplant waitlist mortalityDeceased donor transplantsInactive statusTransplant probabilityInactive patientsMELD scoreDonor transplantsHazard ratioIndependent predictorsTransplant ratesCare coordinationMortalityPatientsTransplantLevel cohortsTertileSignificant differencesCohortMELD
2011
Combined Liver Kidney Transplantation: Critical Analysis of a Single-Center Experience
Cimsit B, Schilsky M, Moini M, Cartiera K, Arvelakis A, Kulkarni S, Formica R, Caldwell C, Taddei T, Asch W, Emre S. Combined Liver Kidney Transplantation: Critical Analysis of a Single-Center Experience. Transplantation Proceedings 2011, 43: 901-904. PMID: 21486624, DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.02.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLiver-kidney transplantationHigh MELD scoreKidney transplantationMELD scoreKidney diseaseEnd-stage liver disease (MELD) scoreCombined liver-kidney transplantationGraft/patient survivalLow glomerular filtration rateOrgan allocation algorithmsPrimary biliary sclerosisRecurrence of HCVSevere HCV recurrenceTransplantation of patientsLiver Disease scoreSerum creatinine levelsRenal allograft rejectionSingle-center experienceGlomerular filtration rateHepatitis C virusPolycystic kidney diseaseBiliary sclerosisHCV recurrenceIschemic hepatitisOLT patients
2010
Use of model for end‐stage liver disease exception points for early liver transplantation and successful reversal of hepatic myelopathy with a review of the literature
Caldwell C, Werdiger N, Jakab S, Schilsky M, Arvelakis A, Kulkarni S, Emre S. Use of model for end‐stage liver disease exception points for early liver transplantation and successful reversal of hepatic myelopathy with a review of the literature. Liver Transplantation 2010, 16: 818-826. PMID: 20583082, DOI: 10.1002/lt.22077.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEarly liver transplantationHepatic myelopathyLiver transplantationSpastic paraparesisEnd-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception pointsEnd-Stage Liver Disease exceptionCases of LTException pointsCorticospinal tract functionFurther hepatic decompensationSetting of cirrhosisSignificant neurological improvementProgressive spastic paraparesisMELD exception pointsHepatic decompensationMELD scoreNeurological improvementFull ambulationNeurological benefitsPortosystemic shuntingHM patientsClinical stageUnited NetworkWheelchair dependencyEarly transplantation
2003
The sickest first? Disparities with model for end‐stage liver disease‐based organ allocation: One region's experience
Schaffer RL, Kulkarni S, Harper A, Millis JM, Cronin DC. The sickest first? Disparities with model for end‐stage liver disease‐based organ allocation: One region's experience. Liver Transplantation 2003, 9: 1211-1215. PMID: 14586883, DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50192.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCadaver liversMELD scoreHepatocellular carcinomaOrgan allocationRegion patientsEnd-stage liver diseaseEquitable organ distributionMean MELD scoreMedian MELD scoreHigh MELD scoreLiver transplant programNumber of transplantationsOrgan Sharing regionsLiver recipientsPretransplantation mortalityMELD exceptionsLiver diseaseSingle centerUnited NetworkTransplant programsWaiting listTransplantationEvidence-based systemOrgan procurementTransplantation Network